Probing The Inaccuracies: Modern Infantry Combat, Part 2

Dual-Wielded Pistols – The Sole Preserve of Action Stars and Blithering Morons: I suppose, if I shut off a small section of my brain, that I could just about make out the reason why the dual-wielding of pistols is so common within the action genre. With the limited knowledge of firearms that most people acquire over their lifetimes, it would be easy to suppose that if a single pistol allowed you a certain amount of firepower, a second pistol would allow for twice that firepower. There are significant failings with this reasoning, though. Even in the circumstance where you’re putting twice the number of rounds downrange, which isn’t always the case, there’s little reason to do so when you can’t put the bullets on target.

Firing one pistol effectively takes a lot of training, more than a rifle or sub-machine gun. A pistol has a short barrel, and apart from a few select models, lacks a stock to brace the gun against a shoulder. To “brace” a pistol, one must therefore use an awkward grip to hold the gun in two hands, and all of the aforementioned factors contribute to the low effective range of a pistol. In the hands of a trained soldier in a good stance, pistols are only expected to be accurate within 30 to 50 metres, compared to double that for a braced sub-machine gun, and in excess of 300 metres for a rifle.

The ammunition of pistols doesn’t help much either. The 9x19mm Parabellum rounds that are standard in NATO countries have a low muzzle velocity, which leads to low armour penetration and a considerably lower kinetic energy than rifle rounds. The low kinetic energy in turn leads to low momentum, a curved trajectory and a short point-blank range versus a more suitable military weapon. Therefore, a pistol is carried primarily by officers, rear-echelon personnel and special forces units as a backup weapon, one that is typically used only when more effective weapons cannot be found, and one that is difficult to use on its own. As the truism goes: “A pistol is a weapon you use to fight your way to your rifle.”

If one pistol is difficult to use effectively past very short ranges, adding another pistol to the picture leaves you with two weapons that can’t be used effectively, with an atrocious effective range, utterly useless on the battlefield and even mostly useless in close quarters. When using two pistols in tandem, one cannot brace either pistol, leaving each hand susceptible to muscular tremors. While single-handed pistol stances were common during most of history, this had more to do with their use as a cavalry weapon, where it was useful to have a hand free for the reins. When pistols became a military backup weapon after the Second World War, it didn’t take long for the two-handed Weaver stance to be formalised. It has since been joined by the isoceles stance, a more natural two-handed pistol stance.

Another problem caused by dual-wielding is the inability to get a proper sight picture through either of the pistols’ sights. This means that one has little in the way of knowledge whether they’re actually pointing the barrel at the target or something a metre or two to either side. This, even at very close ranges, can lead to a significant miss, and more hazardously, shooting something – or someone – completely apart from your target. Not a good plan.

I did mention that dual-wielding doesn’t always lead to twice the rounds going downrange, and this is more significant the larger the rounds being fired are. Even light rounds like the 9mm Parabellum produce enough recoil to shake the guns wildly off target, which means that you constantly have to coordinate your movements to make sure that the pistol is on target. Coordinating movements for a single pistol isn’t too bad; doing it effectively for two pistols is extremely difficult. Trying to multitask with guns is a bad idea at the best of times, but even more so when you’re actually slowing yourself down because you’re trying to do something grossly inappropriate.

Just about the only thing that dual-wielding seems to offer as an advantage is double the ammunition, but even that advantage comes with a massive disadvantage. Once you’ve emptied the pistols of their ammunition, you’re going to have to reload, and reloading of two guns takes more than double the time of loading a single pistol. Without a hand free, you’re going to be fumbling around with the ammunition, trying to find a place to put one of your guns while you’re loading the other one. You could put it in your holster, but then, you’ve got to take it out again when you’re done. You could also put it under your arm, but that’s an incredibly uncomfortable and limiting place to put it, and essentially makes any gun without an empty magazine rather a dangerous prospect to be dealing with. If you wanted extra ammunition, wouldn’t it be a far more sensible idea to deal with a single machine-pistol or sub-machine gun?

The inaccuracy of showing people using two pistols at once tends to be limited to the more absurd movies, to be fair, but it has shown up at times in computer games in which they don’t belong. Counter-Strike comes to mind; there’s no rational reason that a terrorist would use two pistols, and while the game does introduce limitations on the dual-wielded pistols in the game, their presence is still very much incongruous. Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 is an even more egregious offender, with not only dual-wielded pistols, but dual-wielded Desert Eagles and shotguns, all in a game series which trades off its ostensible realism.

Unfortunately, I seem to be fighting a losing war against a sea of fans of utter absurdities and inefficient combat techniques. Never mind that a soldier staring down the barrel of an assault rifle, a sub-machine gun or a combat shotgun is far more imposing than a man holding two pistols in a method that can be proven in seconds to be inefficient. All I can say is that I’m waiting for a movie where somebody goes into a slow-motion jump with two pistols in his hands, and is promptly and unspectacularly taken care of with a single shot from an uninterested soldier with an assault rifle.

That’ll teach you lot to admire dual-wielding so much.

 

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: